四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者论坛

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 898|回复: 12

米国国债的一部分都干啥了?遗少曰:修路。

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-12-17 23:04:02 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
发表于 2013-12-17 23:33:11 | 显示全部楼层
好过造导弹,嘿嘿
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-17 23:45:33 | 显示全部楼层
傻瓜满多 发表于 2013-12-17 23:33
好过造导弹,嘿嘿

不错。
真不明白要那么多的核弹有啥用。
估计那帮将军们的心态同搞一房间高跟鞋的女同志们的差不多。



回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 00:41:33 | 显示全部楼层
柞里子 发表于 2013-12-17 23:45
不错。
真不明白要那么多的核弹有啥用。
估计那帮将军们的心态同搞一房间高跟鞋的女同志们的差不多。

导弹当然需要多一些了。 现在各个军事大国都有相当的导弹防御系统,如果你发射的导弹大部分被人家拦截了,那对方的损失就小很多了。为了最大限度的给对方造成损失,以此为威慑,当然需要很多的导弹。 比如,假如俄国的防御系统可以拦截70%的导弹,而你需要1000枚导弹才能达到目的,那你差不多要有3500枚。

导弹的造价与最先进的飞机相比便宜的很,所以还是导弹核算。


回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-18 02:42:24 | 显示全部楼层
袜贩 发表于 2013-12-18 00:41
导弹当然需要多一些了。 现在各个军事大国都有相当的导弹防御系统,如果你发射的导弹大部分被人家拦截了 ...

哪儿来的70%?
米国对自己的导弹(预先知道其路线)都逮不着30%
米国要有那本事,早对北朝鲜下手了。



回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 03:31:15 | 显示全部楼层
柞里子 发表于 2013-12-18 02:42
哪儿来的70%?
米国对自己的导弹(预先知道其路线)都逮不着30%
米国要有那本事,早对北朝鲜下手了。

你这30%哪里来的? 如果真是如此,为什么还要花成百上千亿去部署? 日本台湾为什么还要花几十亿去购买爱国者3型? 难道这些国家的领导人不知道那是场骗局?

我那70%只是举个例子说明。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 04:54:53 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,我一般不太管你们美国的事。不过这事还真跟“闽猪“有关。能有专门研究政府浪费的民间组织存在,可以发表研究报告,如果不是“闽猪“,恐怕要请去喝茶了。。。。。

木有“闽猪“,你老柞还能在这里叽叽歪歪?如此痛恨“闽猪“,何不去北朝鲜?沙冒!

回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-18 06:15:06 | 显示全部楼层
澳洲大头 发表于 2013-12-18 04:54
呵呵,我一般不太管你们美国的事。不过这事还真跟“闽猪“有关。能有专门研究政府浪费的民间组织存在,可以 ...

once upon a time:
某妇日日祷其佛不断,其夫劝阻勿听。
某日,其夫数呼妇。
妇不胜其烦,道:罗嗦如此,何以度日!
其夫曰:汝佛亦作如是想耳!

悯猪不是日日供大头们日日三呼万岁的。
离专制之日久,依然念念不忘奴才们日日三呼万岁之陋习。
婶可忍,叔不可忍。




回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-18 06:17:53 | 显示全部楼层
袜贩 发表于 2013-12-18 03:31
你这30%哪里来的? 如果真是如此,为什么还要花成百上千亿去部署? 日本台湾为什么还要花几十亿去购买爱 ...

记得几年前看到米军试验反导弹射击的报道:
三发一中。
合理的推算是:大规模射击时的命中率将不足30%。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-18 06:35:33 | 显示全部楼层
袜贩 发表于 2013-12-18 03:31
你这30%哪里来的? 如果真是如此,为什么还要花成百上千亿去部署? 日本台湾为什么还要花几十亿去购买爱 ...

古狗到的实战命中率。
米军先说:80%-50%,更正为70%-40%
小布什说:97%
MIT与以色列的终身脑残们说:<10%
你信谁的?
大头们信08, 认为布什们是傻冒,由此推断,布什泄露了军事机密。


Trial by fire[edit]

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fileatriot_radar_anmpq53_.jpg][/url]
The AN/MPQ-53 radar system used by the Patriot for target detection, tracking and missile guidance



Prior to the Persian Gulf War, ballistic missile defense was an unproven concept in war. During Operation Desert Storm, in addition to its anti-aircraft mission, Patriot was assigned to shoot down incoming Iraqi Scud or Al Hussein short range ballistic missiles launched at Israeland Saudi Arabia. The first combat use of Patriot occurred 18 January 1991 when it engaged what was later found to be a computer glitch.[20]There were actually no Scuds fired at Saudi Arabia on 18 January.[21] This incident was widely misreported as the first successful interception of an enemy ballistic missile in history.
Throughout the war, Patriot missiles attempted engagement of over 40 hostile ballistic missiles. The success of these engagements, and in particular how many of them were real targets, is still controversial. Postwar video analysis of presumed interceptions by Prof. Postol suggests that no Scud was actually hit;[22][23] this analysis is contested by Dr. Zimmerman. Photographs of the fuselage of downed SCUD missiles in Saudi Arabia demonstrate that the SCUD missiles were fired into Saudi Arabia and were riddled with fragments from the lethality enhancer of Patriot Missiles.[24]
Failure at Dhahran[edit]
On 25 February 1991, an Iraqi Scud hit the barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers from the U.S. Army's 14th Quartermaster Detachment.
A government investigation revealed that the failed intercept at Dhahran had been caused by a software error in the system's clock.[25][26] The Patriot missile battery at Dhahran had been in operation for 100 hours, by which time the system's internal clock had drifted by one third of a second. Due to the closure speed of the interceptor and the target, this resulted in a miss distance of 600 meters.
The radar system had successfully detected the Scud and predicted where to look for it next, but because of the time error, looked in the wrong part of the sky and found no missile. With no missile, the initial detection was assumed to be a spurious track and the missile was removed from the system. No interception was attempted, and the missile impacted on a makeshift barracks in an Al Khobar warehouse, killing 28 soldiers.
At the time, the Israelis had already identified the problem and informed the US Army and the PATRIOT Project Office (the software manufacturer) on 11 February 1991, but no upgrade was present at the time.[25] As a stopgap measure, the Israelis recommended rebooting the system's computers regularly. However, Army officials did not understand how often they needed to do so. The manufacturer supplied updated software to the Army on 26 February, the day after the Scud struck the Army barracks.
Preceding failures in the MIM-104 system were failures at Joint Defense Facility Nurrungar in Australia, which was charged with processing signals from satellite-based early launch detection systems.[27]
Success rate vs. accuracy[edit]
The U.S. Army claimed an initial success rate of 80% in Saudi Arabia and 50% in Israel. Those claims were eventually scaled back to 70% and 40%. However, when President George H. W. Bush traveled to Raytheon's Patriot manufacturing plant in Andover, Massachusetts during the Gulf War, he declared, the "atriot is 41 for 42: 42 Scuds engaged, 41 intercepted!".[28] The President's claimed success rate was thus over 97% during the war.
On 7 April 1992 Theodore Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Reuven Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testified before a House Committee stating that, according to their independent analysis of video tapes, the Patriot system had a success rate of below 10%, and perhaps even a zero success rate.[29][30]
Also on 7 April 1992 Charles A. Zraket of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and Peter D. Zimmerman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies testified about the calculation of success rates and accuracy in Israel and Saudi Arabia and discounted many of the statements and methodologies in Postol's report.[31][32]
According to Zimmerman, it is important to note the difference in terms when analyzing the performance of the system during the war:
  • Success Rate – the percentage of Scuds destroyed or deflected to unpopulated areas
  • Accuracy – the percentage of hits out of all the Patriots fired
In accordance with the standard firing doctrine on average four Patriots were launched at each incoming Scud – in Saudi Arabia an average of three Patriots were fired. If every Scud were deflected or destroyed the success rate would be 100% but the Accuracy would only be 25% and 33% respectively.

220px-Patriot_radar_anmpq53_.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 06:48:29 | 显示全部楼层
插不上嘴
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 06:52:17 | 显示全部楼层
柞里子 发表于 2013-12-18 06:35
古狗到的实战命中率。
米军先说:80%-50%,更正为70%-40%
小布什说:97%

怪不得土耳其要买中国的红旗-9呢。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-12-18 09:16:19 | 显示全部楼层
柞里子 发表于 2013-12-18 06:15
once upon a time:
某妇日日祷其佛不断,其夫劝阻勿听。
某日,其夫数呼妇。

哈哈,说你自己哪?就你天天叽叽歪歪。。。。。千方百计要证明“闽猪“不好。。。。。好也好,不好也好,见仁见智,你说你天天叨叨累不累?沙猫啊


回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者网站

GMT+8, 2024-11-22 04:14

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023 Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表