四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者论坛

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 2266|回复: 12

[镜头滤镜] TOKINA 11~16 效果报告

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-8-17 12:33:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
这就是上次提到的荒地,广角效果没我期待的好,可能是因为风景本身没有产生距离感的缘故。






糖水美化一下



刚开始用,嘿嘿,待续。
发表于 2008-8-17 16:37:27 | 显示全部楼层
风景本身不是那个样,你非得给人家弄成那个样,你以为你是我党,想把云彩往哪边扒拉就往那边扒拉啊?哈哈。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-17 18:07:42 | 显示全部楼层

我还是觉得原片纵深感强,可能没戴眼镜的缘故,

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 00:45:11 | 显示全部楼层
没办法。还就喜欢没加糖的
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 04:25:54 | 显示全部楼层

毁人不倦:

广角可不是135的长项。何况你这副厂头。玩广角还是要大画幅,起码往中画幅整吧。你还是听我的,上个ALPA吧。还记得我转贴的不?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 10:03:54 | 显示全部楼层
天色漂亮,只是近景太平淡,,没有吸引眼球的地方。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 10:05:21 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 leicaski 于 2008-8-18 04:25 发表
广角可不是135的长项。何况你这副厂头。玩广角还是要大画幅,起码往中画幅整吧。你还是听我的,上个ALPA吧。还记得我转贴的不?


在网上,大画幅显不出优势。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 10:31:00 | 显示全部楼层

改成版画

铜版
s_02.jpg

套色木刻
s_04.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 10:32:41 | 显示全部楼层

党代表发言了。嘿嘿

原帖由 问题多 于 2008-8-17 16:37 发表
风景本身不是那个样,你非得给人家弄成那个样,你以为你是我党,想把云彩往哪边扒拉就往那边扒拉啊?哈哈。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 17:04:58 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 mofun 于 2008-8-18 10:05 发表


在网上,大画幅显不出优势。


要看谁的作品了。我是不行。真正的高手拿出的中画幅,大画幅,一眼就看得出来那是135办不到的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-18 17:46:55 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 柞里子 于 2008-8-18 10:31 发表
铜版
228

套色木刻
229


哈哈,你这个木刻居然把云彩变成了中国地图,还嫌不够党啊?嘿嘿
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-20 01:12:08 | 显示全部楼层

有谁试过Tokina 12-24

和11-16相比如何?
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-20 10:32:08 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 袜贩 于 2008-8-20 01:12 发表
和11-16相比如何?


我是在PHOTOTZONE看到Review后决定买11~16的。

VerdictThe verdict about the Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X DX can't be easy because its quality varies across the different characteristics. In terms of resolution the lens is on a very high level. The center performance is excellent throughout the whole range. The borders are (naturally) quite a bit worse especially at f/4 but very decent from f/5.6 onward. Distortions are comparatively low for an ultra-wide lens and vignetting may only be an issue at 12mm @ f/4. On the downside chromatic aberrations are a significant problem at harsh contrast transitions - at least if you perfer straight JPEGs or plain converted RAWs. The problem can be almost completely avoided by using intelligent RAW converters such as Raw Shooter Essentials or by manual correction via Adobe Camera RAW or similar tools. So whether this characteristic is a problem for you is dependent on your workflow. Beyond CAs the lens doesn't really like contra light. Using the supplied hood is a good idea here and if possible light sources in the image field should be avoided. Typical for all Tokina AT-X lenses the build quality is on a very high level putting many lenses from other manufacturers to shame especially when considering the quite affordable price of about 450 EUR/US$.

Optical Quality:   
Mechanical Quality:
Price/Performance:


http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/379-tokina_1116_28_canon

VerdictThe Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX is currently the best ultra-wide angle zoom lens for Canon EOS APS-C DSLRs. The resolution is impressively high throughout the zoom range (albeit a short one) and across the image field. Vignetting is really only a problem at 11mm @ f/2.8 but otherwise the issue is very well controlled. The level of distortions is comparatively low. Typical for most Tokina lenses it has one weakness: lateral CAs which are very high at all settings. The build quality is on a very high level and its a joy to handle the lens out there. All-in-all a very sound package especially when considering the quite affordable price (around 600EUR/US$).
Optical Quality:   
Mechanical Quality:
Price/Performance:
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者网站

GMT+8, 2024-11-12 11:47

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023 Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表