|
发表于 2014-4-30 23:23:19
|
显示全部楼层
袜贩 发表于 2014-4-30 21:49
这个斯特林是个非常狡猾的人,很多人都知道他有种族主义倾向, 但却很难抓到真正的证据。这回让抓住了。
不 ...
it's not so simple.
In the US, it appears to be something as follows:
****************************************************
Do Restaurants Have the Unrestricted Right to Refuse Service? No. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly prohibits restaurants from refusing service to patrons on the basis of race, color, religion, or natural origin. In addition, most courts don’t allow restaurants to refuse service to patrons based on extremely arbitrary conditions. For example, a person likely can’t be refused service due to having a lazy eye.
Note thatsexual preference or orientation is NOT on that list. To me that is still discrimination.
Heck, in San Francisco you can even bar people wearing google glass from cafes.
What Conditions Allow a Restaurant to Refuse Service? There a number of legitimate reasons for a restaurant to refuse service, some of which include:
- Patrons who are unreasonably rowdy or causing trouble
- Patrons that may overfill capacity if let in
- Patrons who come in just before closing time or when the kitchen is closed
- Patrons accompanied by large groups of non-customers looking to sit in
- Patrons lacking adequate hygiene (e.g. excess dirt, extreme body odor, etc.)
In most cases, refusal of service is warranted where a customer’s presence in the restaurant detracts from the safety, welfare, and well-being of other patrons and the restaurant itself.
See the last point?
I have no idea how this works in Japan. I'd think it's something similar.
of course it's bad for business and it's bad for the Japanese PR. And no way it is something that should be encouraged. But like i said, it's not so simple as -- educate the public about the war and discrimination then they will not put out those signs. The problem has many layers. Quite often discrimination, especially xenophobia, raises its ugly head at economic downtimes.
|
|