|
发表于 2010-12-9 19:17:05
|
显示全部楼层
不无道理。但是,但是,但是,。。。。。如果说澳洲也是受害者,就要牵涉到更多的秘密和关系了,有些东 ...
MyNameIs 发表于 2010-12-9 17:14
哈哈,看法不一样是正常的。咱都是侃大山,随便说。。。。
1. 我是说“澳洲政府”是受害者。不是指澳洲或者澳洲人民。这里不牵涉对错、该揭不该揭的问题。政府,确切地说政治人物深受其害,恨不得他去地狱。在这种情况下,指望政府去关注他的人权,不符合常理。
2. 那个越南小伙,我不记得媒体报道确切有多少次。但当时是跟踪报道一直到他被处决。当时的澳洲总理霍华德给新加坡总理写信求情也是事实。要说白人,Shepel Corby 和 Bali 9 (其中一个好像是华人)现在还在印尼的大牢里。办不到的事也没办法。你得尊重人家的司法。上次一个澳洲人(白人)在泰国因为出版的小说里涉嫌侮辱泰国王被判刑,按照西方的价值观那真是胡扯蛋。但那是人家的法律,澳洲也没办法,只能警告自己的国民在他国要遵守人家的法律。后来还是泰国皇家赦免,据说外国人在泰国犯的这一类的罪最后一般都赦免驱逐出去。也许你说的对,我太善良,宁愿不相信阴谋。
你说的政府关注白人的人权胜于于亚裔人士的人权,也许有这样的情况,但我找不到实列来佐证。要证明这个可能也很难,除非有相同的案例不同的结果。这种不同或许正是因为民意的左右吧,因为白人人多,声音响一些。华人则不啃声。
也是闲扯而已,不必认真。
注:
-------------
关于媒体对那个越南小伙是否重视,维基百科里有一段,从中可见一斑:
链接: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Tuong_Nguyen
Media coverage
Channel Seven program Sunrise had reporter Chris Reason reporting from outside the jail, and Melbourne reporter Nick Etchells reporting from a church in Richmond at the time Nguyen was due to be hanged. Channel Seven also had Adrian Brown report minute by minute, and, at around 6:10am SGT, he reported: "Well, it's just about 6:10 now, so it's fair to assume that Van Nguyen is now dead" and had been covering all the news throughout the previous fortnight. ABC broadcast a documentary: Just Punishment on 7 December 2006. This documentary was filmed over a period of two years. Following Nguyen's mother(Kim), his brother and his two close friends, through the appeals, and campaigns held (in Australia) before the execution day.[19] It was rebroadcast on the night of 8 December 2008, also on the ABC.
哈哈,一些细节都不记得了。刚看到:当时全国掀起了声势浩大的营救行动。当时的总理,联邦议会以及所有各州的州议会全部正式出面请求赦免。新加坡就是不为所动。就在他被处死的前一天有人想出这样一个注意:赶紧在墨尔本起诉他贩毒,这样要求新加坡引渡。。。。。。看这个:
Pleas for clemency
A plea for clemency by the Australian Government was rejected in October 2005.[8] Members of Federal and state parliaments appealed for the decision to be reconsidered and clemency to be granted. His hanging was the first execution of an Australian in Southeast Asia since 1993, when Michael McAuliffe was hanged in Malaysia for drug trafficking.
On 21 November 2005, the Australian Government was considering a request made by Nguyen Tuong Van's lawyers to apply for a hearing at the International Court of Justice which required the Singaporean government's agreement to its jurisdiction. However, Foreign Minister Downer considered it unlikely that the Singaporean government would agree.[9] On 24 November 2005, Victorian Attorney General Rob Hulls met with Singapore's Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs Ho Peng Kee to press the case for clemency but was unsuccessful.[10] On 28 November 2005 Australia's Human Rights Commissioner, Sev Ozdowski, said Australia must keep pressuring Singapore to abandon the death penalty, even if it proves too late for Nguyen.[11]
After his sentencing in March 2004, the Australian Coalition Against Death Penalty (ACADP) was reported to be inundated with emails from Australians offering support for Van Tuong Nguyen.[12] [13] Politicians[14] and religious figures made pleas for clemency, but these were rejected by the Singaporean government.[15]
One day before Nguyen was hanged, a lawyer launched a last-ditch legal tactic, charging Nguyen with drug related offences in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court, which he hoped would allow the Australian Federal Government to extradite Nguyen. However, Justice Minister Chris Ellison ruled out extradition, saying that the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions would not have attempted to prosecute Nguyen in Australia.[citation needed] |
|