|
发表于 2011-3-31 09:54:33
|
显示全部楼层
这里: 往下走看image quality的图,jpeg比RAW好不少。
袜贩 发表于 2011-3-31 09:21
只看见这段提到JEPG. 没看出你说的那意思。嘿嘿
人家说的是S95的 JEPG其他的好,说的不是LX5的JEPG 比LX5的 RAW好。
不仅如此,还特别指出高 ISO时 得靠 RAW。
=========================================================================
As far as image quality is concerned, none of these three cameras disappoint. All of them are capable of detailed, colorful results in JPEG mode, and even in poor light, noise is well-controlled considering the size of their sensors. At higher ISO settings best results are achieved by careful manipulation of their RAW output, but even JPEGs look fine at small print sizes or for sharing on the web. In terms of critical image quality, there isn't much between them, but if we had to pick one camera purely on the basis of image quality we'd probably plump for the S95, for its sharp, detailed JPEGs.
It's a close run thing though - the P7000 gives excellent images, especially from RAW files and although it is slightly noisier at its highest ISO settings, the LX5 is capable of extremely high quality output. The LX5's trump card, of course, is its multi-aspect sensor, which can turn out higher-resolution images at its various aspect ratios than the S95 or P7000. If you enjoy shooting panoramics, we'd certainly recommend the LX5 over the other two cameras here. |
|