四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者论坛

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 1280|回复: 37

果际先进经验1:摄像加监听

  [复制链接]
发表于 2012-6-17 20:18:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

为了能够帮助无戒在果内迅速推进明珠大爷,特此推出果际先进经验系列。今天是第一集:光放摄像头没用,现在果外都搞监听了。光在政府楼门口没用,机场也得弄。

这是来自加拿大的先进经验。呵呵


OTTAWA -- Airports across Canada are being wired with high-definition cameras and microphones that can eavesdrop on travellers' conversations, according to the Canada Border Services Agency.

A CBSA statement said audio-video monitoring and recording is already in place at unidentified CBSA sites at airports and border points of entry as part of an effort to enhance "border integrity, infrastructure and asset security and health and safety."

As part of the work, the agency is introducing audio-monitoring equipment as well.

"It is important to note that even though audio technology is installed, no audio is recorded at this time. It will become functional at a later date," CBSA spokesman Chris Kealey said in a written statement.

But whenever that occurs, the technology "will record conversations," the agency said in a separate statement in response to questions from the Ottawa Citizen.

At Ottawa's airport, signs will be posted referring passersby to a "privacy notice" that will be posted on the CBSA website once the equipment is activated and to a separate help line explaining how the recordings will be used, stored, disclosed and retained.

Already, though, the union representing about 45 CBSA employees at the airport is concerned personal workplace conversations and remarks could be captured and become part of employees' official record, Jean-Pierre Fortin, national president of the Custom and Immigration Union, said Friday. He added the union only learned of the audio-recording development this week, after reporters began making inquiries.

The recording equipment may also be linked to a federal initiative to help CBSA combat organized crime and internal smuggling conspiracies at big Canadian airports.

A 2008 RCMP report said at least 58 crime groups were believed active at major airports, typically by corrupting airport employees or placing criminal associates in airport jobs to move narcotics and other contraband to and from planes.

The Customs Act was amended in 2009 to allow for the creation of "customs-controlled areas" within airports, starting with those in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, followed by Ottawa and other international Canadian aerodromes.

A crucial aspect of the change are proposed regulations giving border-services officers expanded powers to question, examine and search airport workers and travellers, both domestic and international, within the designated areas.

The controlled areas at Ottawa's Macdonald-Cartier International Airport include the areas surrounding aircraft that have arrived in or are about to leave Canada; the primary inspection area where all travellers must report to a border-services officer; the secondary inspection area where border-services officers conduct further examinations of travellers and goods; as well as certain holding and departure areas at the airport.

The Treasury Board requires government departments to conduct a "privacy-impact assessment" before establishing any new or substantially modified program or activity involving personal information. The assessment is then reviewed by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

The office this week said it is reviewing a CBSA privacy assessment for the customs-controlled areas.

But, "we have not received a privacy-impact assessment regarding audio-video monitoring at the Ottawa airport," said spokeswoman Valerie Lawton. "If the CBSA were to introduce audio-video monitoring, our office would expect a full privacy-impact assessment, which we would review and make (non-binding) recommendations as necessary to protect privacy."

An official with the Ottawa International Airport Authority had no comment on the CBSA installations, saying the two organizations are distinct and separate.


-- Postmedia News

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/be-careful-what-you-say-at-the-airport-159339035.html

发表于 2012-6-17 21:29:43 | 显示全部楼层
为了能够帮助无戒在果内迅速推进明珠大爷,特此推出果际先进经验系列。今天是第一集:光放摄像头没用,现在 ...
问题多 发表于 2012-6-17 20:18



   看这趋势, 估计以后在公厕、旅馆卧室及洗手间都会安装这种装置了,这样就连做梦说梦话都能监听了,拉屎放屁最好也把声音弄小点,要不然警察还以为是试验炸弹呢............难啊
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-17 22:18:13 | 显示全部楼层
看这趋势, 估计以后在公厕、旅馆卧室及洗手间都会安装这种装置了,这样就连做梦说梦话都能监听了, ...
顺手 发表于 2012-6-17 21:29



   这果外现在也弄得草木皆兵的。真让人不可思议。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-17 23:25:53 | 显示全部楼层
地点:某一远离城市、位于高速公路旁边、为乘长途公交车而设的免费公共停车场
时间:某日清晨
情节:
        一工程车驰入,停在一灯杆下
        工人下车,爬上灯杆
        不过,不是更换灯泡,是更换架在灯杆上的摄像镜头。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-18 07:30:53 | 显示全部楼层
摄像头只是个工具。可以用它来做坏事,比如控制百姓、维护统治者的江山稳定。也可以用它做好事,比如监测恐怖份子,保护人民利益。。。。。。。。。。。呵呵。。。。。。这要看具体目的了。

当然,摄像头会侵犯个人隐私。还可能被心术不正的操作者利用等等。这是个附带的问题,如何解决,如何平衡,很难。而使用摄像头的目的才是最最重要的。这就像打针,如果是为了治病,疼一点也就忍了。但是为了注射毒品。。。。。。当然对有了毒瘾的人来说,他也认为是正常的,也应该忍,这才是最悲哀的地方。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-18 22:39:27 | 显示全部楼层
摄像头只是个工具。可以用它来做坏事,比如控制百姓、维护统治者的江山稳定。也可以用它做好事,比如监测恐 ...
澳洲大头 发表于 2012-6-18 07:30



   呵呵,得解释清楚,什么是恐怖分子?穆斯林群体在中东就被称为受害者,人肉炸弹就被称为是被迫;但是到了欧洲就被视为恐怖分子,与人民为敌;当年以色列抗英,被当地人视为民族英雄,被英国人视为恐怖分子;老冒当年如果被当作恐怖分子处理,何至于有今天。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 02:57:50 | 显示全部楼层
摄像头只是个工具。可以用它来做坏事,比如控制百姓、维护统治者的江山稳定。也可以用它做好事,比如监测恐 ...
澳洲大头 发表于 2012-6-18 07:30

都是理科生的罪过 文科生从来不发明这些乱七八糟的东西
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 09:29:50 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,得解释清楚,什么是恐怖分子?穆斯林群体在中东就被称为受害者,人肉炸弹就被称为是被迫;但是 ...
问题多 发表于 2012-6-18 22:39



    这个问题的确有杠可抬。简单地讲,在伦敦地铁放炸弹炸死平民的肯定是恐怖份子。摄像头的录像在破案过程中起了很大作用。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 09:30:17 | 显示全部楼层
都是理科生的罪过 文科生从来不发明这些乱七八糟的东西
傻瓜满多 发表于 2012-6-19 02:57



    你算什么生?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 10:04:28 | 显示全部楼层
回复 8# 澳洲大头



所谓恐怖分子,其实都是政治犯。


如果恐怕分子的罪名能够成立,中国所谓的革命先烈如徐、秋之流都是恐怖分子。
米国所谓国父们,也都是恐怖分子。

有人拿被害者是平民来说事。
其实,哪次战争不死平民?
很多所谓战士难道不也是因为发生战事而从平民招募或强拉的么?
为什么打战死人就不被指为恐怖分子所为?
打胜仗而杀人如麻的将军们都当英雄供着。
米国在伊拉克、阿富汗都没少杀平民,为何仅把米国攻击的对象叫恐怖分子?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 10:28:57 | 显示全部楼层
你算什么生?
澳洲大头 发表于 2012-6-19 09:30

我是边缘科生,既学“无穷序列” ,“泊松分布” 又学“资本”“剩余价值”,
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 10:43:52 | 显示全部楼层
这个问题的确有杠可抬。简单地讲,在伦敦地铁放炸弹炸死平民的肯定是恐怖份子。摄像头的录像在破案 ...
澳洲大头 发表于 2012-6-19 09:29



    那么,假设要是在伦敦地铁放炸弹炸死的都是军人或警察,放炸弹的人是不是恐怖分子呢?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 10:57:08 | 显示全部楼层
那么,假设要是在伦敦地铁放炸弹炸死的都是军人或警察,放炸弹的人是不是恐怖分子呢? ...
顺手 发表于 2012-6-19 10:43



    那叫“地对势力”

严格地讲,与军队作战的不能称恐怖份子。恐怖份子的目的是通过屠杀平民制造恐怖。杀军人那叫战斗。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 10:59:46 | 显示全部楼层
那叫“地对势力”

严格地讲,与军队作战的不能称恐怖份子。恐怖份子的目的是通过屠杀平民制 ...
澳洲大头 发表于 2012-6-19 10:57


一颗原子弹扔下去,杀死多杀万平民。

那不叫制造恐怖?
不可救药的逻辑。嘿嘿
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 11:09:13 | 显示全部楼层
回复  澳洲大头



所谓恐怖分子,其实都是政治犯。


如果恐怕分子的罪名能够成立,中国所谓的革命先烈如 ...
柞里子 发表于 2012-6-19 10:04



    美国在别国杀平民时,他们把这种现象叫“collateral damage”,即他们要杀的目标不是平民,平民死伤是附带损害。但对于死去的平民和他们的家属来说没啥两样,人都被杀死了,家人会为此感到愤怒,恐慌和悲伤,同样形成恐怖气氛。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|四海人民公摄 - 海外华人摄影爱好者网站

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:38

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023 Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表